Birth Rights

Human Rights

The problem with Human rights is that they are a mass of rights that try to cover wide-ranging areas and that they are trying to cover people of different developments, ages and comprehension’s under a single catch-all referencing system. Yet another example of the one size fits all program going drastically wrong. The abuses by itinerant land hoppers that are making a mockery of every country’s laws, that they are trying to force themselves onto. Human rights that are not earned as a valid return for paying your dues as a citizen of a country, mean that a universal human is the subject of the texts and rulings. As we all know only too well the universal word inhabitant does not exist yet.

The Bill of Human rights is a one-sided charter that has no level of duty or care built into it. It should hold that each person respects every other persons human rights and that should they knowingly deny anyone their right to their property, their safety and health, by a criminal act, say theft, violence or murder that they will forfeit their rights to full human rights, until the countries crime debt is paid to law or until they earn the right to their rights again by probation, social service, armed service or gainful employment and good citizenship acts.

Because it is not the democratic state that we have to fear, but unchecked capitalism, dictatorships and tyrants that will never accept the bill of rights, it is also from the rule benders and land hoppers approach to using systems against themselves, for their own advantage. The right to family yes in the country of birth, any other country after you prove your allegiance and gain citizenship, you agree to a residency allowing migrant workers the right to prove their citizenship.

The fundamental flaw is that every county thinks it is defined by its borders. In the light of the rise of the internet social media we have found that borders are now just land management devices and population control devices, as the internet has broken the bounds of the ties of land borders.

The existing mash of strung together rights has no personal responsibility built into them, and as we all know just does not apply in the real world. The trouble with earned rights is they are really privileges at the end of the day, these cannot be taken away from any individual is the cornerstone of the ideology behind them. But a law-breaker that was born with the full set until they denied someone else’s rights, theft, murder etc, is required to forfeit their inalienable rights until they are judged reformed and are again useful in the community. The country you earned your rights in is the one that owes you the right to them, any other country that you enter, should give you residency rights until the probation for citizenship is agreed or rejected. Once rejected by a country for whatever legal reason they should be given a reasonable time to make their departure, if they abscond, no case, no ruling, no time or money wasted on them just instant deportation when caught. Deportation back to the country of origin and if they sign a declaration to not try to invade again, then to any other country that they elect. Provided that, that country is willing to accept them, otherwise they make their own arrangements for travel and support.

Incarceration naturally restricts the rights of the individual as they pay their penance for their crimes. There is no sections dealing with this in the existing bill of rights as they stand at present. So scrapping them is not the way to go but making amendments to them in light of citizenship gives each country some powers to hold back the tide of human migration.

The natural birth rights of the individual are the basic rights that we are all born with, this covers all the nature and nurture classes that are a birth right of a world inhabitant. The fact that countries do not have any rights is an appalling oversight. This stems from the fact that some countries still use dictatorial practices and are not democratic in their function or are just out and out tyrannies.

The birth rights of a world citizen have to be based on the laws and government type of the country that they come from. Someone moving from one form of rights to another has to be subject to the laws and governmental drives of the country that they are trying to enter. Immigration rights are not set out in the bill and need to be addressed for better management of this migration problem.

Most democratic countries with plenty of land can afford to adhere to the bill of human rights better if the country has rights that can be exercised for the indigenous population. A country that has a limited land base like all small islands will need to use a different set of rules for accommodation. No itinerant migrator that is not a migrant worker on residency rights has greater rights than a resident or indigenous person from that country, like someone coming from a non democratic country. Asylum (for larger land based countries) being given to people from trouble torn countries should be redressed to residency or subject to care taking welfare as laid out by a countries people’s charter. A crammed and overcrowded country will cease to prosper and its earnings will suffer from the surplus. This will effectively stem the rush to the gates.

Using a proving ground to validate some unknown persons intentions and merits seams harsh but the indigenous people have earned their rights by the parents sacrifices and work efforts to change the political system into a democracy, the rights are then inherited by the next generation hence inalienable. No country with limited land can simply apply an open door, the limits must be set to keep the stability of the country as it stands. Large influxes from foreign nationals from war-torn lands may well be the reason to invade and stabilise the country to stop the migration.

For island nations with limited land and resources like the British Isles this is fast becoming the area that needs to be addressed. There are no easy solutions, it is not a quick and simple problem and mistakes will be made, but with a will towards improving the countries stability and safeguarding the citizens prior rights is the first port of call in this forward journey, this form of redress is long overdue. The systems that try to use a one sizes fits all solution to a diversity of rights and apply them to everyone is building a disaster by the day and the longer we take to address the problem the bigger the abuses will be.

Until a full democratic constitution has been agreed to, that makes the nations people the key resource and their pulled resources its wealth we are still a long way from true democracy, the people of a nation must fight for and establish their own constitutional charter, that holds a government responsible to the people, that must uphold the bill of rights and that the country has policies in place that will deal with crime, immigrants, criminal organisations and businesses, crooked cops and the judiciary as well as destructive banks that squander money and crooked businesses and practices that penalise people, that also has charters that deals with education, child safety law and commerce. We are on the right road but let’s be honest, this is walking speed, not a car or train journey and picking our way over uneven ground with heavy baggage is not the best way to travel as the horizon is obscuring the destination. Simply put the short term goals are obscuring the main aim, the need for quick fixes just has to be put on hold for the moment to deal with the longer term problems.

When a working draught of the constitution is in place a government is sworn in to act on the behalf of the people of the country, whose inherent rights will be protected, the party member that is being sworn into duty to the state must accept that they will not be allowed to play at party politics in office. That no conglomerate or capitalistic body will have any rights over a nation and its people and that to conduct business in that country they are subject to its laws and taxes raised on behalf of the people for the good of the entire nation. A country is the embodiment of the people’s of the nation and if the people have a collective set of rights then so does the government have a duty or responsibility to carry out the nations rights on their behalf, this should include the right to defend the nation from any kind of invasion or attacks as well as monetary abuses. While a government is in transition from a pseudo democracy to a full democratic charter it will still need to be monitored, for any person that has once had power, they do not willingly hand it back or give it up without a fight.

1. The rights of birth are the set of rights up to the end of childhood.

The newborn has the right to expect to not be battered beaten or abused at the hands of their own family, neighbours or third parties or the state, that they are all born with the right to safety, sustenance and shelter. To be educated and cared for in a nurturing environment and fashion to develop into adulthood. To be taught the necessary social skills for integration with our peers. These are the natural-born rights of any living being.

2. Adult rights the inherited rights of a naturalised citizen of the nation.

As a citizen of the country your constitutional rights are inherited, they will remain in place while you adhere to the constitution and do not knowingly deny someone else or strip someone else of their rights. The rights have a duty of care to uphold the rights of others and a constitutional right to live and work in and with the country to its and your mutual benefit or profit.

3. The right of Governance for the elected body of the people to act on its behalf under the terms of its constitutional charter.

That a government cannot knowingly use its powers against any citizen that is not a criminal. That the government has a duty of care to its own naturalised citizenry first and foremost without penalising any other persons constitutional rights from their own country.

4. The rights of an asylum seeker as they apply for residency or are a resident worker.
5. The penal rights of a convicted felon.
6. The natural rights of sovereignty to make trade agreements, form alliances and partnerships with other member nations.
7. The right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness or fulfilment as long as it’s pursuit does not deny someone else of their rights or steal their rights by criminal acts.